Ilford fp4 rodinal

Ilford fp4 rodinal. HP 5 würde ich auf keinen Fall in Rodinal entwickeln, es sei denn ich möchte möglichst ausgeprägtes Korn erhalten. It does not get more Rodinal than this. FP4 hat in Rodinal auch bei mir unglaublich aufgesteilt (Du nennst es "ausgebrannt") und richtig schlechte Ergebnisse gebracht. Schöne Schattenzeichnung. The highlighting and gradient effect Recently I posed a question about using a liquid developer like DD-X or Rodinal for FP4+. Rodinal 1+25 Ilford Ortho 80, Milton Keynes. über ein zu grobes Korn machen. I realised that the times for FP4+, 9 minutes for 20C and 7 minutes for 24C, are grossly off by a I use Rodinal developer, which seems to last forever and is super-economical. In Rodinal empfinde ich den FP4 etwas sagen wir mal ungewohnt, so daß ich hier nur XTOL benutze. Type – 517 was the designation given to 400ft bulk reels intended for cine use which Ilford used to manufacture. Ilford FP4+ in HC-110(B) vic. Rodinal- because my negatives look better when I do it. Delta 400 is I use Pan F, but usually FP4 and occasionally HP5. La prova è continuata con la Ilford FP4 Plus, utilizzata sempre nella Werra e l’ho sviluppata in #9 Ars Imago alla diluizione 1+25 per valutare come si comporta questo rivelatore alla sua diluzione “base”. Finally, as I referred Buy some Rodinal and learn how to stand develop. I just got back from a family reunion where I had to take a bunch of shots of my relatives, both posed and unposed. It has superb exposure latitude above and below its ISO 125, (meaning it can be both push or pull-processed). Or try Moersch Tanol for high contrast scenes/bright sunshine. Looking at the pool from that search it looks like a good combo. Natürlich könnte man auch This is my first roll test of FP4+, and ID11, and it's also my 3rd roll of home B/w developing. com) gehe und den dort als SW-Film entwickeln lasse, müsste das gehen oder. Recipe & dev times for Ilford FP4+ 125 at 400 in Agfa Rodinal 1+50. 30s initial agitation, 5 invertions every minute. What’s more interesting is when I tried the film using 1+25, I Ich kann immer wieder nur empfehlen die Ilford Filme in Ilford Entwickler nach Datenblatt zu entwickeln (z. Entwickelt habe ich bei 20 Grad, wobei die Temepratur währnd der Stunde nat. Apr. Forent. Ich selbst habe gute Erfahrungen mit FP4 und XTOL gemacht. I was expecting a very fine grain, and high amount of accutance but was slightly disappointed. der Wehner Ich glaube, der einzige Vorteil bei Ilford ist, dass die Chemie besser verpackt ist, z. Da er als ISO-100-Film jedoch schön hochauflösend ist, ist er For high quality black and white photography, Ilford FP4 Plus is unrivalled. If you have used Agfa* Rodinal before you can achieve identical results with Adox Rodinal RO9. Recipe Id #9979. Die Grauwertwiedergabe ist durchaus vergleichbar und sie sind sich nach meiner persönlichen Beurteilung ähnlicher als der FP4 - sind aber wirklich keine großen Unterschiede. FP4 517 Cine, Rodinal 1+50. Canon AE-1 Program. Ja, er arbeitet steiler. Antworten #8 RE: Filmentwicklung This post examines the normal development time for my home-made Rodinal in a 1:25 dilution. Stand development For Stand Development dilute 1:100 or 1+200, develop for 1 hour. Junto a la HP5 Plus 400, en Ilford conviven clásicos como FP4 Plus 125 o las más recientes Delta 100 y Delta 400, películas de grano tubular. com IE100, ID11 1+3, 20. Expire: Ilford FP4. The first FP4 appeared 10 years before I was born, and the Plus version appeared in 1990. I'm using Ilford FP 4 plus and Kodak D-76 developer 1:1 at 68 degrees F. If you don’t like grain, try Ilford Delta 400 and develop in Xtol or D76. Since learning about what it could do years ago, I’ve had an affinity for Ilford Ilford's FP4+ is the newest version of its excellent, medium speed, cubit grain, panchromatic black & white stock. the best stuff for HP5+; it does OK in 4x5, because the large size of. Adox Rodinal. I find that RPX 100, Fomapan 100, Fuji Acros 100 (OG, but Acros II will do just as well), and Ilford FP4+ perform in ways I have never seen them perform in any other developer. Please support mflenses. Results: Use APH-09 (Rodinal) and you can make it moody and grainy, and with Ilford’s LC29, contrasty subtle tones with great depth. Den FP4+ würde ich einfach mal in Rodinal oder ID11 / D-76 baden. Ilford HP5+ 400. und Ilford-Kipprhythmus (alle 1 Min. The grain was very acceptable, RPX400 @ 800 developed in Rodinal certainly gives more grain. I started getting into film photography during 2012 and I was using the classic black and white film, Ilford FP4+. Auf jeden Fall steigt die Körnigkeit etwas. Sensibilidad media. Recipe Id. But in There is a thing that bothers me - various sources state different dev. Recent Flickr photos tagged with this recipe. Cheers, Roger With 400 speed films like Kodak Tri-X, Tmax 400, and Ilford HP5, Rodinal gives a slightly gritty look that I like for documentary work. Kodak D-76 is not a typical developer to be used for stand development, with Rodinal developer being most often used for this purpose. This is how I use it for all films and I never get blacks blocking up, even with Pan-F. So Rodinal can give extremely fine grain with Tmax 100 as fine as with Xtol but These two are with RO9 (Rodinal copy) with the film rated at 125, this gives negatives with very good accutance but a bit grainy, I think dilution of the RO9 was 1:10: Two with Paterson FX-39, 1:14 dilution, this gave less grain than RO9 but similar accutance, again rated at ISO 125: This was with Fomadon LQN, rated at 125, gave good accutance and grain, this was I mostly want to try this developer with Ilford FP4+ as that is my main medium speed film I use with R09/Rodinal 1:50. Film negatives developed in Rodinal look much sharper than those developed in Kodak D-76. - Not as well with the Kodak Tri-x, and the Ilford Delta series and a totally mess with Ilford HP5 (unless you like the grain, I mean the very very big one). in ID11). PanF ist als einziger Ilford bei mir zum Schluß noch übrig geblieben. It is ideal for high quality indoor and outdoor photography, particularly when giant enlargements are to be Rodinal eignet sich gut für niedrig- und mittelempfindliche Filme (bis 125 ASA) mit klassischer Kornstruktur. It is a high acutance developer, producing unmistakably grainy (not unpleasingly so, but none the less visibly grainy) pictures. Das Ergebnis Also, den FP4 habe ich als 4x5-Film und den entwickle ich auch 1:100 in Rodinal für 1 Stunde Stand - und bin superzufrieden. Ilford FP4 Plus in Kodak D-76 . This review is about an adventure in Camogli, a medieval village in Liguria, Italy in the company of my trusty Praktica camera and a roll of Ilford FP4+. This curve is also representative of roll film and sheet film formats. Ilford FP4+ 125 at 400. However, Ilford FP4+ requires twice developing time in Rodinal than Fomapan 100. Roll 03 – Rodinal I’ll admit these aren’t my favourite, but there’s nothing wrong with them either. Recipe Id #12716. Er arbeitet auch steiler als sein direkter Mitbewerber von Kojak. I. I’ve shot nearly every other black and white film: Ilford Delta 100/400/3200, Ilford FP4, Ilford HP5 (pushed, of course) Kodak Tri-X, Kodak Tmax, Fomapan, and even a bunch of expired films. Joined Aug 18, 2017 Messages 523 Location Netherlands Format Digital Sep 20, 2018 #6 An obvious choice is FP4+ @ EI I have been using Ilford FP4 since 1972. These times have been taken from the manufacturer’s recommendations. The developing time is indicated in 9 min with 1:25 dilution Rodinal and 13 min with 1:50 dilution. It looks more detailed compared to FP4+ developed using Rodinal. Expose at EI-100. Every photographer should learn how to do this at least once in their life. E. I find 35mm FP4 a little to grainy for my portraits and similar to 35mm Kodak Tri-X 400 in that regard. Each shot on a different day, in different conditions, and various cameras. My guess is you'll probably The developer was Rodinal, developed at my standard dilution and time of 1:100 for 10 minutes at 70º F. Then I went and soaked all three rolls in a single tank for one hour in a Rodinal bath. No experience with Pan 400, but 11 min @ 22 degrees sounds a bit long to me. B. kippen !) und ISO125/22°. ILFORD FP4 PLUS is a medium speed, all-purpose black & white film with very fine grain and outstanding sharpness. This film Diese Review ist über ein Abenteuer im Camogli, einem mittelalterlichen Ort im italienischen Ligurien, wo ich in Begleitung meiner verlässlichen Praktica und einer Rolle Ilford FP4+ war. i usually develop this on rodinal and, overall, i'm pretty happy with the results i've been getting. Every time I finish my scans, I tell myself I need to use FP4+ more often. Due to its high concentration, a small amount of Rodinal can develop a large amount of film, making it economical for photographers who develop sporadically. I have used pretty much all other Large Format film on the marked and have not seen any I hated FP4+ in both ID11/D76 and Rodinal- but I was stuck with some hundred meters worth of bulk rolls in the freezer. Kingpin Multiformat Set to 6X9. ILFORD FP4 Plus is anexceptionally finegrain, medium speed, black and white film. I tried HP5 @ 800 and developed in Xtol. 4, Rodinal 1+25, 9:35 min, 16°C, 30:30:1 Ilford Pan F+ Schwarzschild-Effekt. Der FP4 kommt z. In my first post of this series I explained the process for testing my home-made Rodinal developer with Ilford HP5 35mm film. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over I shoot FP4+ at 200iso on occasions and develop in ID-11 for 15 minutes, it is the time recomended by Ilford for FP4+ shot at 200iso and I find it gives good negatives for use in the darkroom, so yes I agree with awty. That said, a poll conducted in a large group of film photographers on Facebook suggests most users prefer to push HP5+ using Kodak HC-110 developer. Ilford’s DD-X is renowned for So I just finished the roll got it in the tank and realised there are no times that i can find and trust for my new developer "Rodinal" at 50iso. Format. - I use the recomended 1:15 Here is a sample of FP4+ from one of those experiments, top sample is Rodinal 1+100 stand, bottom is also Rodinal 1+100 stand, but with 500mg/L of Benzotriazole, 900mg/L Potassium Thiocyanate, 5mg/L Potassium Iodide added, Benzotriazole on it's own would work too. 28 minutes at 20°C/68. Wer nicht belichten kann soll nach Aussage von Ilford zum FP4 greifen. Prime May 8, 2022 in Film Forum Share More sharing options Followers 0. Ilford FP4 Plus 125 is one of the more unique films on the market. He developed in Rodinal at 1+25 for 12 minutes 30seconds at 20°c. Der Scanner kann natürlich auch noch zum körnigen Gesamtergebnis beitragen. Just want to ask if anyone has experience with the 125 FP4+ or 400 HP5+ in combination with Rodinal. g. Our aim is So for today’s post, I went out with three different films, Ilford FP4+, Rollei Superpan 200, and Kodak TMax 400. PART 1: The basics – Rodinal Stand Development; PART 2: More in depth – Rodinal Semi-Stand Development Having said that: the typical use case for Rodinal are classical grain films (in Ilford lineup this would mean FP4/HP5+). I bought a 1L packet of ID-11 and I’m burning through it quickly. Think about it, you can run a roll of Kodak Tri-X and Ilford FP4 at the same time in the same tank! Found an old Why I haven’t shot it at the beach is a mystery. I still have to finish it and at this time of year an ISO 125 film roll is too slow for the grey winter in my area. Tutorial: Rodinal Stand Ilford FP4+ Ilford FP4+ By Mr. By mazurekmazurek on 18 May 2019. I know these are rather standard films, but I never used them before. You lose speed and gain grain. Or Kodak HC-110 or Ilfotec HC for maximum sharpness. I know that Rodinal is higher acutance and will be grainier, but is it Rodinal Stand Development – This was my preferred method of B&W film developing when I first started film photography and developing film at home. i use ilford films (fp4+ mostly, occasionally hp5 and delta 3200) with ilfosol. As with any film it will be exposure and development which affect the final look. 8 C Planar . EI-80 in PMK, so its a stop faster. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over Kann ich Rodinal wirklich 1:100 ohne Gefahr für die beiden Ilford Filme (HP5+ / FP4+ )verdünnen ? Wie lange ist denn dann die Entwicklungsdauer? Ist die Temperatur auch 20°c Gibtes einen anderen Kipprhythmus? Da ich noch Rodinal stehen habe (noch nie benutzt), wäre ich Euch sehr dankbar für eine Aufklärung!! Peter. For films 100asa and below I like Rodinal (1+50) for the look it gives with those films. Cheers! These are what Ilford FP4 could look like when developed with Rodinal according to my research. " Ilford's times are 15m for EI125, and 13m for EI50 (Perceptol 1+1 20C). Prime said: It’s not There was an Ilford developer, almost certainly a version of Rodinal called Hyfin, only available in powder form where the development was 18 mins for both Pan F and FP3 (in those days before FP4) and a stern warning not to use it with anything faster! It has not been available since the 1960's and oddly enough Ilford will not release the Ilford FP4+ 125 at 100 in Foma Fomadon R09 1:80 1 hour (Stand developed) at 20°C/68. I have some thoughts about that in the context of these tests that An extremely useful medium speed all rounder, Ilford FP4 Plus has been an industry standard for many years. ) Dank dem Mittelformat braucht man sich hier wesentlich weniger Gedanken über eine zu geringe Auflösung bzw. Januar 2012 um 10:35; Frank Nößler. Kingpin Multiformat Set to 6x9 . I haven’t had enough time with this developer to evaluate it well. 4 lens. Rodinal 1 to 25 dilution. I would also be interested in trying it with Ilford HP5+ and Fuji Acros II. Also ist der Film sehr wahrscheinlich überentwickelt. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over Lastly, there are films that I simply like the look of in stand development, in particular, Ilford FP4 (HP5 less so, but I do use stand development when push processing this with Rodinal). Recent Flickr photos tagged with this recipe . Ilford FP4 works well in Rodinal, but I think the highlights are harsher in Rodinal than in PMK with FP4. I wanted a little more contrast than rated at the standard ISO125 and so I tried this roll rated at ISO200 for which the Massive Development Chart recommends Rodinal 1:25 for 15 minutes at 20ºC which I used here. Leica M3 + Leica Noctilux 50mm f1. ILFORD FP4 Plus 125 Schwarzweißfilm, 120 Rollfilm: Der ILFORD FP 4 Plus ist ein mittelempfindlicher Schwarzweißfilm (ISO 125/22°). g. the negative hides a lot of defects, but the grain is excessive and Best Developers for Ilford HP5, FP4, Agfa Copex HDP13 :: Film :: Home :: Darkroom Try 1:50 Rodinal for FP4. The negative looks very high contrast, but the scanner saved me - I was able to recover details. These times are t An extremely useful medium speed all rounder, Ilford FP4 Plus has been an industry standard for many years. I have been using Ilford’s technical data sheet says the best overall image quality and film speed for HP5+ is attained using Ilfotec DD-X. From which you can branch out into more I would be interested in hearing from anyone who has personally compared the two. For me 13 minutes in Rodinal 1+50 at 68F/20C worked best. hier: >Foma 100 und Rodinal<, >FP4+ und Rodinal<. Selbst an einem bewölkten und verregneten Sommernachmittag gibt es mit diesem Film dank seinem exzellentem Kontrast und großem Belichtungsspielraum tolle Fotos. Kentmere 100 und FX39 II bin ich noch nicht warm geworden, da waren die Ergebnisse mit Rodinal bei mir besser, jedenfalls bisher. for contrasty textures etc. Zusammenfassung: Als ich damals damit anfing meine Filme selbst zu entwickeln, war Rodinal mein erster Entwickler. 3. Is it I used the Rodinal on Pan F, and Very Old FP4. So Rodinal can give extremely fine grain with Tmax 100 as fine as with Xtol but Ilford DD-X works well with Delta 100/400. Fine sharp salt and pepper grain, sharp pictures and beautiful contrast. Prime said: It’s not Agfa Rodinal 1+25 − − − 6 8 − − HP5 Plus film developed in ILFORD ILFOTEC HC (1+31) stock for 6½ minutes at 20ºC/68ºF with intermittent agitation. My Account. To summarise: I'd use the Delta 100 for photos where you want very even characteristics across the whole tonal range and the FP4+ for punchy contrasts e. ADOX works together with former Agfa scientists on all Agfa-replacement products. 223. Not unpleasantly grainy, but of the sort "this grain was supposed to be there and it is" result. Thank you everyone for your visits, faves and comments, they are always appreciated :) City of London by Scrufftie 29 2 Ilford FP4 Plus . 5 minutes and rate at ISO 100 unless light is harsh. With plenty of exposure flexibility and with a healthy margin for user error, this film is ideally suited for beginners and Minolta XD-7, MD Rokkor 50mm 1. I think it has to do with how sharp the images are. Dieser Entwickler kann unter bestimmten Bedingungen auch Schwächen aufweisen: 1. Each time a film is developed, a new batch is mixed, typically at a ratio of 1:25 to 1:100. Ilford FP4 Plus in PMK An extremely useful medium speed all rounder, Ilford FP4 Plus has been an industry standard for many years. Rodinal and DD-X are now the only 2 film developers I use and as has already been said they are very different. Praktica mit Ilford FP4 in Rodinal, Zeiss Ikonta-M 524/16. I shoot FP4+ at EI100 and develop in Rodinal 1+50 at 68F for 11m 45s. Even in a cloudy and rainy summer afternoon, the film made its best thanks to its excellent contrast and its Ilford FP4+: ISO 125/22°. 30s initial agitation, then agitate 10s every minute. I used 1:150 rodinal to tap water. Ny default developer is either HC110 or Rodinal. I personally found Ilford's times for FP4 in Rodinal to be too long, and AGFA's times to be WAY too long. Developer. In addition to general photography, FP4 Plus is also FP4 kommt einfach körnig in Rodinal, im Mittelformat fällt es natürlich nicht so auf. Ilford FP4+ Ilford FP4+ By Mr. Dieser Film ist eine ausgezeichnete Wahl für eine hohe Bildqualität ohne überlange Belichtungszeiten. High edge sharpness and low veil. Tabular grain films (such as Delta 400 you mention) usually benefit from a dash of solvent in developer. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over some portraits with 35 'cron, M6, ilford FP4 and rodinal 1:100 Sep 11, 2010 ILFORD FP4 PLUS 125ASA RODINAL 1:100 60' stand development at 20oC agitation first 60 seconds then 10 seconds agitation every 30mins No stop bath (10' of water wash) any comments are welcome -- hide signature -- Top Rated Gear: Adox Rodinal Acutance Enhancing 16 oz Film Developer. Second, it does not curl up like Fomapan. I am being pretty careful but am getting some confusing results. You could shoot Delta 100 for the rest of Rodinal: Compard R09 Special: Agfa Rodinal Special Agfa Studional R09 Studio Rodinal Special: Delagi #8: Formulary Modified Pota: Edwal 12: Formulary D-12: FA-1027: Arista Premium Liquid Clayton F76 Plus: Flic Classic MQ: Arista 76 Powder Calbe F19 Ilford ID-11 Kentmere K-76 Powder Kodak D-76 LegacyPro L-76 Powder Micro-MF PC-TEA Silberra S-76 An extremely useful medium speed all rounder, Ilford FP4 Plus has been an industry standard for many years. Im Mittelformat jedoch nutze ich mittlerweile nur noch 400-ASA-Filme, da mir die weniger empfindlichen wie der Ilford FP4 hier tatsächlich schon wieder zu feinkörnig sind (selbst in Rodinal). In der Regel, entwickel ich die Negative auf Rodinal oder XTol und im Allgemeinen bin ich mit den Ergebnissen sehr zufrieden. Der Film ist seit Jahrzehnten erhältlich und dementsprechend erprobt und getestet. Now I’ve done something like this before using all three Kodak TMax 100 Review. Ornello. VERWIRRUNG TOTAL! Habe dann versucht einen HP5 (KB) in Rodinal 1+50 bei 20°C 11min mit 1min Kippr. A new video available — our trip to Ireland. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over Ilford FP4+ is my favorite film. by Marcello Iannotta 247 10 La Scarzuola, Montegabbione (TR), Italy - 2017. New film and new developing technique! :) Leica M3 + Leica Noctilux 50mm f1. Haven't printed anything yet but the negatives look very decent- sharp with a lot of details. Ilford HP5 developed in Rodinal at 1:100 for 60 minutes. 1:50 dilution, 20 Celsius: Ilford FP4+ 17 minutes, Fomapan 100 9 minutes. mr-alvandi. Thought I'd share an example Ilford FP4+ 125 in Agfa Rodinal 1+25. Hello all. Las I've been getting the densities that you are looking for using Ilford FP4+ with Rodinal 1:25 using JOBO drums. Robuster Allrounder. But Rodinal isn't. I'm really pleased with the result. Daraus machte Ilford nie ein Geheimnis. Help me figure out what I did wrong: The film was shot at 200 ISO FP4 PLUS ISO 125/22º, BLACK AND WHITE PROFESSIONAL FILM FOR HIGH PRINT QUALITY AND FLEXIBILITY IN USE ILFORD FP4 Plus is an exceptionally fine grain, medium speed black and white film. Billy Axeman. Für eine normale Entwicklung habe ich im Forum von Fotoimpex folgendes gefunden: Rodinal 1+25: 5:30 Min. I mounted my Helios-103 lens with a yellow filter attached and loaded some Ilford FP4+ film, later developed in Rodinal (1+100, semi-stand for 1h) and scanned with a Canon CanoScan9000F ii. Tempo sospeso: mi ricorda le giornate in riva al mare negli anni '50 Nikon Fm2 & Washi A 12 iso #35mm It works well with Rodinal, but be prepared for a visibly grainy result. Recent Flickr photos tagged with this Zeiss Ikon Ikonta M and its Novar Anastigmat 1:3,5 f=75mm, Ilford FP4 Plus in Rodinal 1+50 for 10 min @ 20°C and digitalized using kit zoom and extension tubes. 2500; Live Chat; NYC Store; Help; Sign in. I Ilford fp4 @ 250 Asa - Rodinal. 0°F 30s initial agitation 4 inversions every 15m Ilford Fixer By Randomit3 on 04 January 2024 Hi There! I've got a bulk roll of Ilford Fp4 which I bought this summer. At this stage I'm limiting myself to Ilford HP5+ and FP4+, initially at their rated speeds of 400 and 125, but I DO want to push-pull these later. La sensibilidad de 400 ISO se considera un valor medio en la fotografía analógica. Seht Ilford FP4 in Rodinal, Zeiss Ikonta-M 524/16. 2010 #3 Wenn ich zu einem Fotofachgeschäft (www. Once dried negatives were scanned with a Epson v600 scanner then cleaned up and contrast enhanced in Photoshop FILM DEVELOPMENT TIME/ TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION CHART This chart is provided as a quick and easy guide for users who need to adjust development times for processing temperatures In my experince the great results with Rodinal Special are achive in developing the following films: Agfa APX 100 and 400, Kodak TMAX 100/400/3200 and Ilford FP4. He exposed for the shadows, which had the effect of a Ilford empfiehlt bei Rodinal 1+50 20°C, 15 Min. 4c, 20 minutes The attachment are the results. I have shot 35mm FP4 in the Leica film cameras in the past but now tend So I have been using Agfa Rodinal since I first got into developing like 6 months ago, I have always thought my negs looks good but a little grainy I mostly use Ilford fp4+ and hp5+. It has fine grain and is easy to work with. @enriqueferral. 13 minutes at 20°C/68. I had some Rodinal around, so I thought I'd give that a shot with a couple rolls as a quick experiment. Ich möchte ein gewisses Filmkorn bei meinen S/W-Fotografien erhalten. Themenersteller. #12716. Even with the overcooking, I must admit, I really like this combo of FP4 and Rodinal. Recipe Id #12244. Recently, I tried Rodinal 1+100 for Pan F+ and FP4+ and got excellent results. zu entwickeln. From Sella it's a mountain trail all the way to Pino (1659 Mslm) with lovely Hi There! I've got a bulk roll of Ilford Fp4 which I bought this summer. some combinations that don't seem to like a pre-wet- like Fuji Neopan 400 in Rodinal; this combo gives me much better . Except for the fame of Rodinal, is there a specific reason to leave Ilfosol alone, or But you could also try Ilford DD-X for the best “image quality and finest grain” according to Ilford. Agfa Rodinal 1+50. And despite being a low ISO film, there is certainly an uptick in the grain in the negative space. 1 hour (Stand developed) at 20°C/68. zeigen nicht die Rohkopien. Would this be a good start? This is for printing in darkroom with 120 negs. Member. 0 v2 @ f2 + yellow Heliopan 60mm filter + Ilford FP4+ 125 B&W film Shot at f2 with off camera flash I knew the film would be quite grainy so I decided to change my developing. No photos found (view any photos for this Ilford FP4+ 125asa B&W 35mm Film is one of the classic Ilford base products, one that has been around it seems, since the dawn of time! In fact this film can be developed in just about any developer and give good results – you can even make it grainy in Rodinal! It is a film which others are compared to which must be the ultimate compliment and is versatile enough to not worry However, in some developers the times are the same for the current version of FP4 Plus and Ilford Pan 100 (notably for the developers I used for this post, R09/Rodinal and Ilfotec LC29), with the important caveat that FP4 Plus is of course rated 125 ISO at box speed, one-third of a stop faster than the box speed of Pan 100 - not a great Piove Zenit ET (1981) + obiettivo Zenitar 1. Filmkorn wird nicht „geschönt“. Please Like and Subscribe if you do :)Massive Dev Charthttps:/ First, it is faster. I don't really care for FP4+ in Rodinal. 12. ilford fp4+ is definitely one of the best "all-purpose" black & white films avaliable on the market. I'm Good that some can apreciate Ilford film, i can no longer. I normally process my FP4+ in Rodinal 1+50, but here I wanted to see all dilutions from 1:25 to 1:200. I'm not sure, but I think earlier boxes of fp4+ had 6 minutes printed in recommendations, and newer along with pdf's on Ilford site state 9. Inversions for first 30 But let’s talk films here, some of my favourite stocks that work great with Rodinal include Ilford Pan F+, Rollei RPX 25, and Ilford FP4+ on the slower side of things. 5N . 5: 20C: Ilford FP4 ILFORD FP4 Plus is an exceptionally fine grain, medium speed black and white film. Thanks. I have had a couple of frames with pinholes in the emulsion with Foma, and never with Ilford. So when I recently went to a weekend trip to Prague I decided to use up a few rolls and tried out Calbe A49 (formerly known as Agfa Atomal and made by the former ORWO chemical department in Calbe). I was considering Ilford Delta 3200 (+ DDX), but it seems (and hope) K400 pushed to 1600 or 3200 may be a reasonable choice. Würde ich diese Entwicklerchemie verkaufen und müsste ich mir hierfür einen schm Andrew was working with Ilford FP4+ by way of a 50mm v4 Summicron, exposing at EI250. Today I will be developing an old roll of Illford FP4+ I found, with Rodinal. I use Rodinal or Perceptol or Tanol now. Posted May 10, 2022. That post possibly refers to a diffusion enlarger, as those are high EIs for Perceptol. Natürlich muss man zuvor wissen, was man möchte. <br> I came across 2 dev times on here the first said fp4 rated at 50 in rodinal 1:50 for 9. Ich bin vorgegangen, wie oben beschrieben. Entwickler die der neusten Rodinal Rezeptur entsprechen: Adox Rodinal / Adox Adonal Tetenal Paranol S; Mamiya RB67 Pro S // Ilford FP4 Plus // Rodinal 1+50 . It worked pretty well for such old film. </p> ILFORD FP4 PLUS is a medium speed, all-purpose black & white film with very fine grain and outstanding sharpness. nor 4:34pm, 11 November 2018. I deliberately An excellent try of such a description can be found in the reviews of James Northcote and James Szylobryt on the 35mmc website (see link below). Click to expand My experience is very similar to yours. In addition to general photography with intermittent agitation in a spiral tank. I am yet to do any big prints, but from my Rodinal developer at 1:50 might improve the edge sharpness of FP4 slightly over ID-11 (less solvent action) - but really the character is built into the dual grain structure. Ilford Delta 400 in Rodinal 1+50 bei 16° Frank Nößler; 3. Here I used Rodinal Stand Development, 45mins 22 degree with 1 inversion (so semi-stand developing really). Follow Frank on IG Handcrafted Kingpin Cameras specializes in the creation of handcrafted luxury pinhole cameras, grips, and Develop FP4 in a high acutance developer, such as Rodinal, and the grain becomes more gritty and quite noticeable on a relatively small print of say, 8×10″ (from a 35mm negative). I realise other developers may give sharper and finer grain results but I wanted to use the developers I know best at this stage. While I'm not familiar with Ilfosol, I have used XTOL 1+3, D-76 (or the Ilford analog ID-11) 1+1 and Rodinal 1+50 with this film and it always turns out well. 9/50 IlFord FP4 plus 125iso @ilfordphoto sviluppato a casa in Rodinal 1+25 #rodinaldeveloper #ilford #ilfordfp4 #zenitet #zenitphoto #bw_perfect #bwphotography #photography #35mm #35mmfilm #analogphotography. It's got some of the finest grain out there, and works wonderfully in Rodinal. For fine grained films like Kodak Tmax 100, Fuji Acros 100, and Ilford Pan-F, the increased grain is not noticeable, but the images look much sharper, with beautiful tonality that no other developer gives. I have Agfa Rodinal Developer. I’ve shot a fair few rolls of FP4+ over the last few years. commight not be available in your country . (ISO 100/ Ilford Pan F+ 50 at 100 in Geoffrey Crawley FX-1 1+1+8; Ilford Pan F+ 50 at 80 in Geoffrey Crawley FX-1 1+1+8; Ilford FP4+ 125 at 200 in Kodak D-76 1+1; Kodak Panatomic-X in Kodak D-76 stock; Ilford FP4+ 125 at 100 in Kodak D-76 stock; Ilford FP4 125 in Kodak D-76 1+1; Ilford FP4+ 125 at 200 in Rodinal 1+25; ORWO NP20 80 at 50 in Kodak XTOL 1+3 701 likes, 6 comments - arijaaksi on August 17, 2024: "a way up . Diese Linearität hilft uns in unserem Kopf die Lichtverhältnisse But where FX-39 shines is with ASA-100 to ASA-25 films. I shot the film rated at 200 (wish I hadn’t now but c’est la I've experienced FP4 in HC-110 only few times because my favourite developer for FP4 is Rodinal 1+50 The first time that I souped FP4 in HC-110 I followed the Ilford Datasheet: HC-110 dil-B 9 min E. I am particularly hoping K400 has the advantages over K100 like HP5 over FP4. Ilford FP4 Plus in D-76 1+1, developed normally, EI-100 Mamiya 645 Super and 150mm f3. How did that dif If it is smaller grain and pushing that you are looking for then you might want to look at this recent video by a presenter called John Finch about the use of Rodinal. That said I happily shoot 120 format HP5, FP4 and Tri-X in my medium format Other good developers for FP4+ are NACCO Super 76, Clayton F60, Ilford ID11, Ilford DD-X, Edwal FG-7 1:15 (in water or 9% sodium sulfite solution), X-tol. Perhaps the best part about using DD-X, is that it gives users the maximum amount of tonality on their negatives. I’ve shot everything from portraits to architecture, to landscapes with it, and I’m always thrilled with the results. Paul Barden is partially right, to a large extent grain properties are inherent in the films's emulsion, with T grain films and similar like Delta 100/100 choice of developer has less effect on final graininess than with conventional films like FP4, HP5, Tri-X etc. 1. Contrast control with Film Developer Dilution ASA/ISO 35mm 120 Sheet Temp Notes; Ilford FP4+ Rodinal: 1+25: 25: 4: 4: 4: 20C: Ilford FP4+ Rodinal: 1+50: 50: 7. I usually stand develop in Rodinal. We have been fortunate enough to come into possession of a large quantity of this film, which we have re spooled for use in 35mm still cameras. FP4 Plus MAKING LONG EXPOSURES For exposures between 1/2 and 1/10 000 second, no adjustments are needed These two are with RO9 (Rodinal copy) with the film rated at 125, this gives negatives with very good accutance but a bit grainy, I think dilution of the RO9 was 1:10: Two with Paterson FX-39, 1:14 dilution, this gave less grain than RO9 but similar accutance, again rated at ISO 125: This was with Fomadon LQN, rated at 125, gave good accutance and grain, this was Recipe & dev times for Ilford HP5+ 400 in Adox Rodinal 1+100. 4. FP4+ sharpness. ID-11 in zwei Beuteln während D-76 in einem kommt. Instead, I found for push to 200 ASA. Bei Architektur ist PanF und Agfapan 25 beliebte Ware, weil Korn, Kante und Schärfe ´ne Summenanforderung ist und die Abzüge oft auch sehr groß werden. Im I have 2 rolls of FP4+ to develop and I’ve got some Rodinal and some FX-39 II to do it with. I don't have Here are some sample images shooting Ilford Pan F 50 at box speed in my Bessa R3A camera and developed in a soup of 1:3 diluted Xtol solution + 1:400 Rodinal. I'd prefer to extend the developer time by using a 1:50 dilution, but I have yet to encounter any uneven development so leaving well enough alone. The bottom sample is of course a couple stops of speed loss. 5 mins and the second said fp4 at 50 in rodinal 1:100 9 mins both at 20c. Where did I leave my shoes no. Ilford FP4+ 125 at 100 in Foma Fomadon R09 1:80 1 hour (Stand developed) at 20°C/68. I am considered a beginer, a little knowledge of b/w developing, but like to share my first few roll of b/w developing. So for me that means using Ilford Pan F @ 50; FP4+ @ 100 and Delta 100 I've been trying to run exposure tests on my Mamiya C2330 S with a Secor 80 mm and a pretty reliable shutter. Ich war sehr I have long thought about making a more controlled test to see the effects of developer dilution. Regards @enriqueferral. It is ideal for Ilford FP4 Plus in Rodinal 1+50, developed normally, EI-100 Haselblad 500C with 80mm f2. Mit ID11 muss eigentlich jeder Film klarkommen, weil die Großlabors das meist eingesetzt haben. MFR: 12054 Adox Rodinal Acutance Enhancing 16 oz Film Developer. Invert twice every 60 seconds. Rodinal is one of the most popular B&W film developers for many reasons, but not least because it is very economical (typical dilution is 1:25 or 1:50) and because it has an excellent shelf life, measured in years, even after opening. Article provides a how to guide together with sample photos and thoughts along the way. I go for the sharpness from fp4+ data sheet from ilford. 1 minute initial agitation and 59' stand. I shot my first roll of it back in 2015, and over the past year and a bit, I've taken Rodinal 1+25 Ilford Ortho 80, Portrait made at Stonehenge during the Summer Solstice, 2023. Der Film war komplett grau getönt (15–20 % Schwarz etwa). _2. Wer es körnig mag, kann Rodinal auch für hochempfindliche Filme verwenden The first time that I souped FP4 in HC-110 I followed the Ilford Datasheet: HC-110 dil-B 9 min E. I also saw an improvement using FX-39 with Fomapan 400 (shot at ASA-200) plus helped Ilford SFX 200 with both I shot a roll of Ilford FP4 + pushed 1 stop to 250 ASA. Hope this helps. Shot with a Rolleiflex 2. I will try the HC-110 on some fresh Delta 400. Normalempfindlicher Universalfilm mit konventioneller Kristallstruktur. _____ Casual attendance these days: Back to top : iangreenhalgh1 Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679 . I think I will carry both K400 and K100, two film backs, with my Hasselblad SWC. 35mm. Notes. If you like to I am particularly hoping K400 has the advantages over K100 like HP5 over FP4. Edited February 21, 2022 by Pyrogallol Ilford FP4+ 64EI to 80EI. I have enough ID-11 to develop about one more LA PROVA SUL CAMPO: LA ILFORD FP4 PLUS. Happy to take suggestions on your favourite FP4 pairings (I’m really interested in one shot liquid developer with long shelf life), but realistically I’ll be using one of these two. Attached are some of the pics all scaned on Canon fs4000u with vuescan software which I find Remember, it will not make light where there isn’t light. Excatly the same receipe as original Agfa Rodinal, but now renamed ‘Adox’ Rodinal after the demise of Agfa Photo in 2005. Business, Edu & Gov; Adorama Rentals; Printique; Our Blog; 800. It would also seem that the Rodinal/HP5+ combination is not considered a perfect match So rather than following my mentor's choice of chemicals I've decided I need to establish my own. I need to develop some FP4, and the only stuff I have around is some unmixed Xtol and some Rodinal. 35mm FP4 Landscape w/ Pentax Spotmatic. I hope you enjoy. Here is my Ilford Pan 400 review after shooting my first few rolls of this budget B&W film. Duration. Does anyone have any reference points for development times with 120 film in an inversion type tank? Develop FP4 in a high acutance developer, such as Rodinal, and the grain becomes more gritty and quite noticeable on a relatively small print of say, 8×10″ (from a 35mm negative). I don't use it with ASA 400 films becoz I feel that results are a bit to grainy for my tastes. Ideal für alles von Zone-Systemlandschaften bis hin zu Porträts. com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order! Search Memberlist Register Profile Log in to Ilford FP4 Plus — Film character that will leave you longing for more. Er kann Street und Reportage bei genügend Licht. For 9 minutes at 1:50. the higher listed concentration does make the film slightly grainier, but i fund it gives texture without being overwhelming, especially with fp4. I have found . Whether it is Delta 100 or FP4+ my Jobo Expert drums just does not like Ilford film. An extremely useful medium speed all rounder, Ilford FP4 Plus has been an industry standard for many years. I personally do not practice this development process with D-76 because, in my opinion, it does not have any advantages compared to the usual development in a 1+3 dilution, unlike, for example, stand Ilford's standard time for FP4 in perceptol 1+1 is 15 minutees if I remember correct. Fomapan 100 . These are cubic grain films that are not necessarily as sharp or uniform as the Delta or “professional” lineup. I used 35mm Kodak TMax 100 in my Nikon FM and Voigtlander Bessa R3A rangefinder and 120 Kodak T-Max 400 I use the Xtol + Rodinal blend quite often, and love the results from Delta 100, FP4+ 125 and Tri-X. it was the first black & white film i've ever tried, quite a while ago, and i still use it because Ilford FP4 Plus 125 35mm: Great in Every Weather Condition 3 8 Share Tweet. Store in cool dry conditions. >> Join me on YouTube! 35mm Ilford Pan 400 B&W film The wash after I fixed was just normal tap water at 31c once the film is fixed does it matter what temp the wash is ?<br /> My Final time was Ilford FP4+ rated 64iso, Agfa Rodinal (7 years out of date) 1:50 for 11minutes @20c shot on Canon 1v 50mm 1. 9 minutes at 20°C/68. Zusammen mit dem HP5+ DER Klassiker von Ilford, der nicht totzukriegen ist. I continue to have issues on the back of the film facing the drum. Dann reicht mir für die große Mittelformatkamera manchmal bei eher dunklen Lichtverhältnissen im Winter Ilford FP4 in Rodinal (Diese Beispielbilder wurden später partiell weich nachbelichtet bzw. :: MF Galleries :: Home :: B&W Film Gallery. I slightly overexposed based on my meter reading from her skin. No photos found (view any photos for this Paul Barden is partially right, to a large extent grain properties are inherent in the films's emulsion, with T grain films and similar like Delta 100/100 choice of developer has less effect on final graininess than with conventional films like FP4, HP5, Tri-X etc. If you manage to find Perceptol, buy it! You won't be dissapointed. Perceptol works great with FP4+, but takes longer to develop and is getting harder to find. My favorite development times for this combo in 135 film are: shot as ASA 400 => 11:00 minutes in Rodinal 1+50 at 20 °C; shot as ASA 800 => 08:00 minutes in Rodinal 1+25 at 20 °C It's either Rodinal, XTol, some ID11 and a few DDX-friends, while Ilfosol seems to be the poor beginners choice, soon to be given up in favour of something different. In other words, we normally rate the film at least a third stop slower than the full film speed, BTW, developing the FP4+ using Tetenal Ultrafin T-Plus works really well, too. Der nächste Kandidat für FX39 II The Ilford Party Line is that while some people get good results with FP4 in Rodinal, they don't recommend it because it gives poor speed and large grain (as it does with many films -- the only reason I can see to use it is because you like the tonality). _10. Ideal für Außenaufnahmen. Januar 2012 um 10:35 #1; Zunächst wünsch eich Euch allen ein gesundes neues Jahr 2012 . #analogphotographer#analogphoto#filmgrain#darkroom#bnwphoto#monoart#mediumformat#rolleiflex#rolleiflex28f#ilfordphoto#ilfordfp4#rodinal#irelandphotography". Example Images Deine Beobachtungen zum Delta 100 im Vergleich zu eher traditionellen Filmen wie FP 4 ist richtig. Trying to decide if it could replace FP4+ in 120 and sheet film for me or not. It's got some great 'bite' and is very sharp. His results impressed me but I need to add he is using Ilford FP4 and not APX 400. By DankSpangle on 29 March 2021. Use of Rodinal. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over Stand development with D-76. 0°F. In XTOL 1+1 kommen beide, als auch der FP4 recht feinkörnig. Fotofilme lassen sich in gewissen Bereichen als linear bezüglich der Belichtung beschreiben. I used Ein Praxistest von Karl Neumeier testete den FP-4 Plus von Ilford auf fünf Arten: Drei Kipprhythmen (3 Sekunden-, 30 Sekunden-, 1 Minuten-Rhythmus), Rotation und Standentwicklung. The ISO speed rating was measured using ILFORD ID-11 developer at 20ºC/68ºFmade. I usually have Rodinal, D23, D76 ready to go in the house. in D-76 VIEL feinkörniger als in Rodinal. Using Ilford FP4 and HP5, I pre-wet with a few developers- like . I use Rodinal for developing all my film, I use alot of Fomapan or TriX, i am venturing into using Ilford FP4 and am thinking of shooting it at 80asa and dev. By GörlitzPhotography on 09 March 2015. I used a 1:100 Rodinal stand development for 45mins at 21 degrees with a few turns in first 10 seconds and 1 mid way. For FP4+ I prefer using Rodinal or ID-11/D-76. I exposed 4 sheets of 8x10 on a sunny day with no clouds and no change in light. Ilford Plus films are designed for the average consumer, but you’ll find that the nomenclature of consumer versus pro is really more about shelf-life and price. Ilford FP4 Plus in PMK Pyro . Lediglich die Preise müssten haarsträubend sein ^^. Start there, then experiment. For 2013 I tried Kodak TMax 100 film and liked this modern emulsion using T-grain for finer more grain free results for scanning. If you like to ILFORD FP4 ISO 125/22ºBLACK AND WHITE PROFESSIONAL FILM FOR HIGH PRINT QUALITY AND FLEXIBILITY IN USE FACT SHEET 94117D. But you can get magical results from Kodak Tri-X with a Ilford FP4 Developed in Rodinal I develop my own black and white film using a Patterson tank. I especially recommend Rodinal for Fuji Acros As mentioned earlier, FP4+ is not too fussy. Mischung 1+50 bei 20°, 15 Minuten lang, 2 mal pro Minute gekippt, etwa 20 Prozent über der empfohlenen Zeit. IMO Rodinal 1+50 works really well in 120 format, and a bit less so in 35mm only if you are planning 10x enlargements or better since you Agfa und Rodinal war für mich eine glückliche Kombi, Ilford und Rodinal eher weniger, versuche mal ID11. Many photographers routinely expose it at 100ASA as this is mildly over Ilford FP4 Developed in Rodinal I develop my own black and white film using a Patterson tank. Ilford's time for FP4+ @ 200 in Rodinal 1+25 is 13 minutes. Adox Rodinal RO9 Film B&W Developer is produced acording to Agfa Leverkusen´s latest Rodinal* formula from 2004. The truth is, you’ll get better of both from a T-grain film like Delta 100 or T-Max 100, even when I stand developed Ilford FP4+ ISO 125 in 500ml of 68F, 1:100 Rodinal for an hour. In this sense, FP4 Plus can really be like dozens of different films all wrapped up in one package. I have never used Rodinal stand development myself so I cannot add any personal experience We normally rate Ilford HP5 Plus and Kodak Tri-X at 320 (in-camera meter) or 500 (spot meter), developing in Ilford DD-X for a true ISO of about 650; Ilford Delta 3200 at 2500, developed at the time recommended for 3200; and Foma 200 at 125, typically in DD-X again which gives ISO 160+. So why now Ilford XP2? Simple - I was trying to keep my black and white work cost-effective, which Auf einem Datenblatt von der Ilford Hompage wird in Rodinal folgendes angegeben: 1+25= 6min und 1+50= 11min. But it's certainly not something I do all the time. That said, lower ISO films, like Tmax 100, or FP4 are less likely to benefit from these effects. Ein universelles Material für alle Innen- und Außenaufnahmen mit feinem Korn, hoher Kantenschärfe und einem weiten Belichtungsspielraum. Other good developers for FP4+ are NACCO Super 76, Clayton F60, Ilford ID11, Ilford DD-X, Edwal FG-7 1:15 (in water or 9% sodium sulfite solution), X-tol. Bei Interesse lesen Sie auch den Artikel Ilford FP4 in Rodinal (Mittelformat). Supporting Member. . Could you tell me the reason? Thomas Ilford fp4 + ist auf jeden Fall einer der besten "all-purpose" SW Filme. I should have rated both of them slower. That means that the negatives will look relatively flat when compared to other developers like Rodinal or pyro-based developers. Damit hast Du zielsicher die Kombinationen gewählt, vor denen hier immer gewarnt wird, siehe z. I enjoy Der Ilford FP4 Plus ist ein solcher – seit Jahrzehnten. Ilford Pan 100 vs FP4 Plus – again both Ilford films but Ilford FP4+ is quite well known for the classic grain structure (which can be too much for me at times)(i’m a sucker for fine grain and detail!). Auch die Lichter waren eher mau. FP4+ harmonitr nicht gut mit Rodinal, ich rate davon ab. I mean these almost seem overly sharp, too sharp if you catch my drift. i use rodinal with foma films because i like the extra grain, but in my experience/opinion it doesn't look great with I rated FP4+ (120 format) at ISO 125 and developed in Rodinal 1+100, 68F for 20 minutes. Film. It is ideal for high quality indoor and outdoor photography, particularly when giant enlargements are to be made. März 2010 um 07:42; Tim Maseizik *Forent* Beiträge 108. 5: 7. Though these days I rate it at 100 ISO, only because at one time I also used Delta 100 and left my exposure meter on 100. The FP4 MUCH slower. Again, some photographers will regard this a a desirable look whilst others may find it too much. . Wir kennen das alle, wenn wir die Belichtung umrechnen von f/8 bei 1/500s zu f/11 bei 1/250s. Link on the bio page. Inversions for first 30 secs then a couple of inversions each minute. Reply to this topic; Start new topic ; Prev; 1; 2; Next; Page 2 of 2 Recommended Posts. 0 v2 @ f1 + yellow Heliopan 60mm filter + Ilford FP4+ 125 B&W film I knew the film would be quite grainy so I decided to change my developing. I’ve seen really awful results with clean factory fresh FP4+, and Am letzten Wochenende nun habe ich erneut ein FP4 entwickelt, diesmal aber in FX39 II und das Ergebnis waren Negative mit wirklich feinem Korn, mindestens auf dem The FP4 Plus performed well in the XA, giving good sharpness and detail. You’ll also want to typically shoot at ISO 400. wuestefeld. Most photos were taken with a Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1. Its very fine grain, outstanding sharpness and high acutance make it the film of choice whenever a job demands Film. Ich habe wegen der schlechten Schatten die Great your article, I'm also looking for the BW film that I like completely, I have 2 years of shooting on film and I agree with you regarding the Ilford FP4 I like more than I've shot so far in BW, and I'm for buying some Ultrafine Extreme films that I have read is something similar to Ilford FP4. Kompatibilität: Mittelformatkamera Beide gefielen mir in Rodinal nicht wirklich gut, FP4 zu körnig und der Foma steilte mir in Rodinal zu sehr auf. I'm sure you'll My film of favour used to be Ilford FP4+ processed in Rodinal; I. times for ilford fp4+ in rodinal 1:25 - some say 6 minutes, some 9. The Plus range, or “consumer” film consists of Ilford Pan F Plus, FP4 Plus, and HP5 Plus. Beiträge 8 Wohnort Wiesbaden. A unique feature of Rodinal is that it works as a “one-shot” developer. Man bekommt bei korrekter Handhabung gleich gute entwickelte Negative. Some of the nicest 35mm FP4 shots I have ever seen were processed in PMK. If too grainy, try Rodinal at 1+50 (starting Ilford time is 20 minutes). With plenty of exposure flexibility and with a healthy margin for user error, this film is ideally suited for beginners and professionals alike. The downside of testing with medium format film is that the differences will not be as apparent as they will on 35mm film. We cannot guarantee the results and therefore all times should be treated as a guideline. And I wonder if it makes sense to develop any of the two in Rodinal as I heard a lot of bad things about the combination (especially for the HP5: "extreme grain"). Look up Delta 100 on the Massive Dev Chart and you’ll find over 200 lines of film speed, developer and dilution combinations to try. I compare Ilford Pan 400 vs Kentmere 400 after buying a 10 pack of each film. Ilford FP4+ 125 at 200. I had shot a roll of film in my Zeiss Ikon Contessa LK, an early-1960s viewfinder camera with a coupled light meter. Ilford gibt dann auch die Haltbarkeit der Pulver als "unbeschränkt" an, während Kodak ein Verfallsdatum hat. Advertisement (gone after registration) 21 minutes ago, Mr. Stand development is also largely insensitive to variations in exposure and allows for the development of films rated at different speeds to be processed in the same batch. Products Brands Used Deals Today's Top Deals; Adorama Credit Card; VIP Rewards; Gift I was pleasantly surprised by the sharpness and fine grain of Kentmere 100 when compared to other classic film emulsions such as Ilford FP4 plus and Ilford HP5 plus. Im letzten Jahr hat mich der Silbervirus wieder ergriffen und Helgoland musste also für die ersten 3 Deltas herhalten . Ilford FP4 Plus in D-76 1+1, developed normally, EI-100 Mamiya 645 Super and 80mm f1. If you are starting out with it stick to the maker’s recommenced speed and development. I don't have From Loco (678 Mslm) the beautiful stone path is very easy to Sella (1025 Mslm). 1+200 can be developed for up to 2 hours and can give you a 1 stop speed increase! Here, we have listed the Ilford film developing times. Ehrlicher Film ohne Schnickschnack und mit beherrschbarem Kontrastverhalten. Rodinal 1 to 50 dilution. I metered with Minolta Autometer V and my exposure was 1/15 s f:22. By trabancos on 24 November 2019. Try Ilford Perceptol for Pan F and rate it at about 25/30 ISO. FP4 Plus has a speed rating of ISO 125/22º (125ASA, 22DIN, EI 125/22) to daylight. nicht 100% stabil bleibt. In mehreren Foren wird 1+50 mit 15min angegeben. Years ago I would have used ID11 or D76 at 1:1. Ob man das an Dear Buddies, Ilford FP4+ and Fomapan 100 have about the same speed. It looks like sombody was walking on my film. Medium Format. 18. Agfa gibt 8min in 1+25 an aber auch nicht 1+50. Tim Maseizik; 12. Both of these are legendary fine-grain film developers in their own right. Any major differences in spectral response? How about characteristic curves? What does CHS II excel at? I heard Adox has reintroduced CHS II in roll film format. Works as effectively with long exposure times I tried developing Ilford FP4 Plus in Ilford ID-11 recently. But I have fresh bottles of HC-110 and Rodinal waiting their turns. F Page 4 of 6 Nov 2018 P4 PLUSTechnical Information 35mm and Roll Film ILFORD developer Dilution Meter setting (EI) 50/18 125 /2 200 24 Dip Delta 100 FP4+ Delta 100 FP4+ Delta 100 FP4+ Click any of the images to see them full screen Ilford Delta 100 vs. This makes FP4 PLUS a highly capable film for most photographic subjects, scenarios and lighting conditions. I'm happy with the results so far. com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order! Search Memberlist Register Profile Log in to HC-110 and Rodinal have much shorter development times, which means it’s much more important to get the time right. Zusammen mit dem HP5 DER Klassiker von Ilford, der nicht totzukriegen ist. That has been my go-to combo since my school days. It is especially visible when zooming scanned images to 100%; 2. Members; 650 Share #21 Posted May 10, 2022. Foma has the advantage of cost. FP4 is classified as a medium speed film at 125 ASA/ISO. Rodinal ist kein sorgenfreier Universalentwickler wie z. i love taking this loaded on my camera to the subway and shooting some long-exposure pictures. (See the Kentmere 400 review for full details but I include the Kentmere 400 vs Ilford Pan 400 YouTube video here too). Developed in Rodinal. 0°F 30s initial agitation 4 inversions every 15m Ilford Fixer By Randomit3 on 04 January 2024 Recipe & dev times for Ilford FP4+ 125 at 400 in Agfa Rodinal 1+50. results without a pre-wet. Delta 100 und FX39 II harmonieren für mich sehr gut, nur mit dem APX 100 resp. März 2010 um 07:42 #1; Hallo! Bin gestern frisch von meinem Marokko-Trip zurück gekommen - und bevor ich mich jetzt daran mache, die Filme zu entwickeln habe ich noch ne kurze Frage: Ich musste von Zeit zu Zeit den ein oder anderen fp4er aus By varying the developer of choice (Ilford DD-X will produce a different look than Rodinal 1:50, for example), the temperature of that developer and the dilution of that developer, you can further smooth out FP4 Plus’ grain and contrast or increase them for even more drama. Ho eseguito un prebagno di un minuto, utilizzando la LAB-BOX, a seguire lo sviluppo vero e Last Updated on 07/17/2018 by Chris Gampat. Pese a los diseños de grano más eficiente y plano, la riqueza de grises es una constante en las películas Ilford. PROCESSING HP5 Plus can be processed in all types of processing equipment including spiral tanks, rotary processors, dishes/trays, deep tanks and 久しぶりのロジナール。昨年は輸入が滞り、中々入手しにくい状態でしたが昨年の秋頃から少しずつ入って来ました。改めて使ってみると実に Ilford FP4 is an exceptionally fine grain, medium speed black and white film ideal for outdoor photography. I much prefer Ilford FP4 125 120 film to the 35mm format for this reason (less apparent film grain). Acros is creamy smooth in my opinion, hardly clinical. 125 Agitation: Ilford way (30sec at beginning, then 10sec each minute). W. This gives Recipe & dev times for Ilford FP4+ 125 at 200 in Agfa Rodinal 1:25. Dabei durften zwei grundverschiedene Entwickler an die Schicht: Agfas Einmalentwickler Rodinal, Verdünnung 1+50, und Tetenal Ultrafin plus als substanzreichen Den HP5 in Rodinal nach Waschzettel zu entwickeln (also 11 Minuten bei ISO 400 in Rodinal 1+50 nach 30/30/2) ergibt meiner Meinung nach keinen Sinn - ich habe Negative erhalten, die eine schlechte SChattenzeichnung aufwiesen. 8f camera on Ilford FP4+ film. Das Problem ist, ich hab noch keine eigenen Materialien zum Film Developer Dilution ASA/ISO 35mm 120 Sheet Temp Notes; Ilford FP4+ Rodinal: 1+25: 25: 4: 4: 4: 20C: Ilford FP4+ Rodinal: 1+50: 50: 7. I bought a bottle HC-110 for my minimalist summer lab (I usually use Xtol when I'm developing at the photo club, but I don't want to work with powder at home and a bottle of Xtol gets spoiled after 2-3 months). Heute habe ich einen frisch belichteten (mit ISO 100), 2009 abgelaufenen Ilford FP4+ (ungekühlt gelagert) in Rodinal entwickelt. Or stand develop it in Rodinal 1:100. Dev times for all Ilford chemicals can be found at their website. 5: 20C: Ilford FP4 Rodinal 1+25 ­ 9 13 1+50 ­ 15 20 Kodak D-76 stock 6 8 9 1+1 9 11 15 1+3 14 16 20 Kodak HC-110 A ­ 4½ 6 B 6 9 12 Kodak T-Max 1+4 ­ 8 9 Tetenal Ultrafin SF Stock ­ 7 9 1+1 ­ 11 14 Tetenal Ultrafin Plus 1+4 ­ 6 9 Kodak Xtol stock ­ 8½ 10 . Shooting both of these films on 120, I had a hard time really finding which film was sharper. Ilford FP4 has excellent shelf life. My favorite film is Rollei Retro 400S, I like the contrast at 400 and 800. www Some products in this fact sheet www. What about sharpness? I don't find that FP4+ in Rodinal is sharper than in most of the other developers. bEnE91. Stärker verdünnt wirkt der Entwickler etwas mehr ausgleichend, obwohl man das durch die entwicklungszeit generell regulieren kann. Mein Scanner korrigiert das automatisch und So, I finally developed my first roll of FP4 with Rodinal 1+25, and it came out super overcooked. However, I could not find developing time for 250 ASA. Usually I develop for 13. I found that 10 minutes, or something very slightly shy of this, was appropriate for developing HP5 at box speed (400 ISO). Der einfachste Weg, was dran zu ändern, ist es, einen anderen Entwickler zu nehmen. So I'm planning to shoot my next rolls at 400 or 800 if it's the case and then push develop as I saw the FP4 can handle it without any trouble. Agfa Rodinal 1:25. recently bought some LF gear, however, and decided to switch to HP5+ because the two extra stops are worth it at f/22. For starting out, ID-11 is a mainstream developer that will get you used to the film at "box" exposure and development times. 9N . I tried the HC-110 on some ancient Tri-x yesterday. htef euilp wqqo nivae sbt yvsmtk dfk xgdlh pgne bctjgu